Workspace:Legislation

Parliament Bill No. 282

Approved

An Act Granting Government Officials and Employees of the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao a Thirty (30) Calendar Days Paid Leave to Perform Pilgrimage and Appropriating Funds Therefor

  1. Filed

    Feb 5, 2024

  2. First Reading

    Feb 29, 2024

  3. Referred to the Committee on Rules

    Jun 18, 2024

  4. Committee Report No. 176 RE: 282 and 276 Adopted

    Nov 19, 2025

  5. Deferred (Period of Interpellation)

    Nov 19, 2025

  6. Deferred

    Jan 26, 2026

  7. Deferred

    Jan 27, 2026

  8. Deferred

    Jan 28, 2026

  9. Deferred

    Apr 21, 2026

  10. Deferred

    Apr 22, 2026

  11. Deferred

    Apr 27, 2026

  12. Deferred

    Apr 28, 2026

  13. Deferred

    Apr 29, 2026

  14. Deferred

    Apr 30, 2026

  15. Deferred

    May 18, 2026

  16. Approved on Second Reading

    May 19, 2026

  17. Deferred

    Jun 17, 2026

  18. Deferred

    Jun 18, 2026

  19. Deferred

    Jul 13, 2026

  20. Deferred

    Jul 14, 2026

  21. Deferred

    Jul 15, 2026

  22. Approved on Third and Final Reading

    Jul 16, 2026

  23. BAA No. 94Now

Passed third reading. This measure has cleared Parliament.

What this measure does

This grants Bangsamoro officials and employees 30 calendar days of paid leave to perform a pilgrimage, once in a lifetime. Parliament passed it on 16 July 2026 as Bangsamoro Autonomy Act No. 94, with the leave cut to at most 22 working days.

Eligibility turns on service: an aggregate of 2 years with the Bangsamoro government qualifies, and the leave may be taken only once regardless of which office in the region the employee works in at the time of application. Pilgrimage is defined broadly — visiting a place of religious or spiritual importance to perform acts of worship or a spiritual journey — without naming any faith.

The approval chain is where this bill does its real work, and it runs to the top. The Chief Minister approves applications on the favorable recommendation of the head of office. Parliament's own staff go to the Speaker instead. Local government employees are recommended by their local chief executive and then sent to the Chief Minister through the Ministry of the Interior and Local Government. Every application reaches the Office of the Chief Minister, which keeps the record of everyone in the region who has taken the leave, local governments included. A head of office may refuse to recommend an application if granting it would seriously hamper operations.

2 provisions have no counterpart in the competing bill. Section 7 requires anyone who takes the leave to submit a written report on the pilgrimage they performed, within 30 days of returning to work. Section 8 makes an employee who deliberately did not perform the pilgrimage despite taking the leave subject to administrative sanctions and penalties.

The money goes in the budget of the Office of the Chief Minister, and that office and the Civil Service Commission jointly write the rules within 90 days.

Why it was proposed

There is no explanatory note attached to the filed copy. Section 2 states the policy in 2 sentences: the Bangsamoro Government exercises its powers to promote the general welfare, and it "realizes the role of a strong and contented workforce in achieving a developed Bangsamoro region".

That is a workforce argument rather than a religious one, and it is the only case the document makes for itself. The bill carries 29 co-authors on its face, which is the other thing it offers in place of a note.

Who it affects

  • Every Bangsamoro government official and employee with at least 2 years of aggregate service, including in local government units.
  • Employees with under 2 years of service, who do not qualify.
  • The Office of the Chief Minister, which approves every application in the region and keeps the central record.
  • The Speaker, who approves for Parliament's own officials and employees.
  • Local chief executives, who must recommend before an application can proceed.
  • Heads of office, who may refuse to recommend where the absence would seriously hamper operations.
  • Anyone who takes the leave, who must file a written report and may face sanctions for not making the pilgrimage.

Who would implement it

  • Office of the Chief Minister — approval of every application, central record-keeping, receipt of post-leave reports, and the budget line
  • Office of the Parliament Speaker — approval for Parliament's own officials and employees
  • Ministry of the Interior and Local Government — the route by which local government applications reach the Chief Minister
  • Civil Service Commission for BARMM, jointly with the Office of the Chief Minister — implementing rules within 90 days

Funding

Carries an appropriation. No amount is named. The cost is carried in the budget of the Office of the Chief Minister, with later requirements in the annual Bangsamoro Appropriations Act. Because the leave is paid and runs 30 calendar days, the appropriation is in substance a salary continuation for everyone who takes it.

What changes if it becomes law

  • Government employees with 2 years of service gain 30 calendar days of paid leave for pilgrimage, once in a lifetime.
  • The Chief Minister personally approves every such application in the region, including from local governments.
  • A central register of everyone who has taken the leave is kept in the Office of the Chief Minister.
  • Taking the leave creates a duty to report on the pilgrimage within 30 days of returning.
  • Not performing the pilgrimage after taking the leave becomes an administrative offense.

Raised during deliberations

No published record of the debate on this measure. Parliament’s journals cover sittings up to March 2023 only, and no committee report on it has been published.

What to notice

Sections 7 and 8 are what distinguish this bill, and they are worth stating plainly: an employee who takes this leave must afterwards file a written account of their pilgrimage with the Office of the Chief Minister, and one who deliberately did not perform it faces administrative sanctions. The state is verifying an act of worship. There is a defensible reason — 30 days of paid absence is public money, and a benefit without a check invites the obvious abuse — but the check chosen puts a government office in the position of assessing whether someone's devotional journey really happened. The competing bill, which grants half the days and says nothing about pay, needs no such apparatus.

The approval chain compounds it. Every application in the region, from every ministry and every local government unit, lands on the Chief Minister's desk. For a benefit of this kind the natural approver is the employee's own agency head, and this bill makes that person a recommender only. What the design produces is a single regional register of which public servants have made a pilgrimage and when — a document that does not otherwise exist and that the bill does not say who may see.

Set against Bill No. 276, the 2 measures differ in nearly every parameter: 30 days against 15, paid against unstated, 2 years of service against none, a named approval chain against none, and a sanction against nothing. What they share is the vocabulary of accommodation, and where 276 writes religious neutrality into its operative text by naming both Muslim and Christian destinations, this one achieves neutrality by naming nothing at all — a pilgrimage is any journey to a place of religious or spiritual importance.

The path through Parliament was the same for both. Filed 5 February 2024, First Reading on 29 February, referred to the Committee on Rules in June 2024, and then nothing until Committee Report No. 176 took this bill and 276 together on 19 November 2025. 17 deferrals followed across 20 months before Third and Final Reading on 16 July 2026.

A note on the act number. Parliament's bills index records this measure as becoming BAA 94, and the enacted text published in August 2026 confirms it: BAA 94 is the Pilgrimage Leave Act of 2026. Parliament's acts index gives BAA 94 the title of BAA 93, the Special Geographic Area Development Authority act, and that entry is wrong. What follows is the bill as filed, not the law; the reading of BAA 94 sets out what the enacted text changed.

Read from Parliament Bill No. 282, copy as filed · read September 2026. This section is our reading of those documents, not Parliament’s words.

Follow this bill by RSS · each time Parliament records a new stage. Paste the link into a feed reader, or an RSS-to-email service for alerts by email.

Get involved

Public records get betterwhen people check them.

Spotted an error, or have a document worth adding? Every correction and every source makes the record stronger — and the official source is always right where we are wrong.