Parliament Bill No. 234

In committee

An Act Establishing General Hospital with Twenty-Five Bed Capacity in Municipality of Sultan Mastura and Appropriating Funds Therefor

  1. Filed

    Jul 26, 2023

  2. Enhanced

    Jul 27, 2023

  3. First Reading

    Aug 16, 2023

  4. Referred to the Committee on Health, Committee on Finance, Budget and ManagementNow

    Dec 11, 2025

Under committee study or floor debate. Amendments are still possible, and this is the stage where public input carries the most weight.

What this measure does

This establishes a general hospital with 25 beds in Sultan Mastura, Maguindanao del Norte.

Why it was proposed

The note uses the same frame as its companions: the 6 municipalities of the northern first district of Maguindanao, 345,227 people between them, served by the Cotabato Sanitarium at Pinaring and the Iranun District Hospital at Parang.

Sultan Mastura is the smallest of the 6, with 25,331 people at the 2020 census. Applying the Department of Health ratio of 1 bed per 1,000, the district's 275 beds fall short of its 345,227 population, and the bill proposes 25 beds in the municipality that has none.

Who it affects

  • The 25,331 residents of Sultan Mastura, the smallest of the district's 6 municipalities.
  • Patients travelling to Pinaring or Parang for hospital care.
  • The Cotabato Sanitarium and the Iranun District Hospital, which carry the district.
  • The Ministry of Health, which would supervise the new hospital.

Who would implement it

  • Ministry of Health, which would supervise the hospital and set its structure and staffing

Funding

Carries an appropriation. No amount is named; the title carries "appropriating funds therefor" and the operative text leaves the sum to the appropriations act. The comparable hospitals enacted in this registry each received ₱50 million initially, regardless of bed count.

What changes if it becomes law

  • Sultan Mastura gains a 25-bed general hospital.
  • A municipality of 25,331 people stops depending entirely on facilities in other municipalities.

Raised during deliberations

No published record of the debate on this measure. Parliament’s journals cover sittings up to March 2023 only, and no committee report on it has been published.

What to notice

On the bill's own ratio, 25 beds for 25,331 people is exactly right — the Department of Health standard of 1 bed per 1,000 produces 25 beds for this municipality almost to the person. Of the 4 bills in this set it is the one whose ask matches its arithmetic, which is worth noting because the Buldon bill documents a 70-bed district shortfall and asks for 25, and the Cotabato City bill documents a far larger one.

That precision cuts against the bill as well as for it. A hospital sized exactly to a municipality's own population has no capacity for the neighbouring catchment, and the companion Buldon bill expressly contemplates its hospital serving beyond its own municipality. Two 25-bed hospitals 1 municipality apart, each sized for its own residents, is a different plan from 1 50-bed hospital serving both, and nothing in either bill addresses which is better.

There is a cross-reference worth carrying. Bill No. 284, filed in February 2024 by another member, proposes renaming Sultan Mastura to the Municipality of Subpangen, subject to a plebiscite. If both measures ever moved, the hospital this bill establishes would open in a municipality with a different name from the one in its own enacting text — the kind of collision that follows from measures on the same place travelling separately.

MP Ambolodto filed 4 hospital bills over 2 days in July 2023 — Buldon, Sultan Mastura, Kabuntalan and Cotabato City — and all 4 argue from the same method rather than from hardship. Each names the catchment, counts its population from the 2020 census, lists the hospitals serving it with their bed capacities, applies the Department of Health ratio of 1 bed per 1,000 people, and states the resulting shortfall. No other hospital bills in this registry do the arithmetic. All 4 remain at Second Reading, Committee Stage.

A drafting note common to the set: the constitutional citations are unreliable. Three of the 4 bills cite the right to health as "Section 15, Article III" when it is Article II, and 1 cites the integrated-approach provision as "Section 11, Article XII" when it is Article XIII. Each bill has at least 1 wrong reference and they are not wrong in the same way, which is what happens when a shared preamble is retyped rather than copied.

Read from Parliament Bill No. 234, copy as filed, with explanatory note · read October 2026. This section is our reading of those documents, not Parliament’s words.

Get involved

Public records get betterwhen people check them.

Spotted an error, or have a document worth adding? Every correction and every source makes the record stronger — and the official source is always right where we are wrong.