Filed
First Reading
Second Reading
Referred to the Committee on Amendments, Revision, and Codification of Laws, Committee on Finance, Budget and ManagementNow
Parliament Bill No. 102
In committeeAn Act Splitting the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Agrarian Reform (MAFAR) into Three (3) Agencies, Thereby Creating the Bangsamoro Ministry of Agriculture (B-MOA), the Bangsamoro Ministry of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (B-Mfar), and the Bangsamoro Agrarian Reform Office (Baro), Defining Their Powers and Functions, Amending Book I, Title I, Bangsamoro Autonomy Act No. 13 or the Bangsamoro Administrative Code, Appropriating Funds Thereof, and for Other Purposes
Filed
First Reading
Second Reading
Referred to the Committee on Amendments, Revision, and Codification of Laws, Committee on Finance, Budget and ManagementNow
Under committee study or floor debate. Amendments are still possible, and this is the stage where public input carries the most weight.
What this measure does
This breaks the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Agrarian Reform into three bodies and writes a charter for each: the Bangsamoro Ministry of Agriculture, the Bangsamoro Ministry of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, and the Bangsamoro Agrarian Reform Office. It does this by amending the Bangsamoro Administrative Code, Bangsamoro Autonomy Act No. 13.
The bill is built as five books. Book I sets the policy and performs the separation itself in a single section. Books II, III and IV are full organizational charters — mandate, powers and functions, organizational structure, the offices of the minister and deputy minister, a director general, bureaus and divisions, provincial offices, city and municipal offices, and the qualifications required of every one of those posts. Book V holds the miscellaneous provisions.
Each of the three gets its own field structure down to the municipality, its own authority over those field offices, its own arrangements for coordinating with attached agencies and with agriculture-related national agencies that were never devolved, and its own handling of nationally funded and foreign-assisted programs and of agricultural technicians deployed to local governments.
Book V settles the consequences. Affected officials and employees are compensated under existing law. Each of the three agencies gets a separate budget item in the annual appropriations act. The Office of the Chief Minister issues the implementing rules. A mandatory review falls due after 10 years, and Parliament is given a standing oversight function over the whole thing.
Why it was proposed
The explanatory note argues from the size of the sector. It cites the 2021 Gross Regional Domestic Product: BARMM is predominantly services-based at 38.9%, but agriculture, forestry and fishing follow immediately at 36.4%, ahead of industry at 24.7% — and the sector was accelerating, from 2.7% growth between 2019 and 2020 to 8.3% in the following period. It runs the constitutional argument alongside: Article XII on industrialisation founded on sound agricultural development and agrarian reform, the fisheries provision on small-scale utilization with priority to subsistence fisherfolk, and Article II Section 21 on comprehensive rural development.
The implicit case is that one ministry carrying agriculture, fisheries and agrarian reform together cannot give any of the three the attention a sector that size requires.
Who it affects
- Farmers, fisherfolk and agrarian reform beneficiaries across the region, in a sector that is over a third of regional output.
- Employees and officials of the existing MAFAR, who would be distributed across three bodies and are promised compensation under existing rules.
- Local government units, which receive deployed agricultural technicians and host the new city and municipal offices.
- Agrarian reform beneficiaries specifically, whose function moves to an Office rather than to a Ministry.
- National agencies with agriculture-related mandates that were never devolved, with which each new body must coordinate separately.
Who would implement it
- Bangsamoro Ministry of Agriculture (B-MOA), with a Minister, Deputy Minister, Director General, bureaus and divisions, and provincial, city and municipal offices
- Bangsamoro Ministry of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (B-MFAR), on the same pattern
- Bangsamoro Agrarian Reform Office (BARO), headed by a Regional Director with an Assistant Regional Director, services, and city and municipal offices
- Office of the Chief Minister, which issues the implementing rules
- The Bangsamoro Parliament, given a standing oversight function and a mandatory review at 10 years
Funding
Carries an appropriation. No figure, and no transitional cost estimate. Book V says only that funding for the three agencies shall be included in the annual General Appropriations Act of the Bangsamoro in a separate budget item for each. Standing up two ministries and an office where one ministry stood — with provincial, city and municipal structures for each — carries a cost the bill never attempts to state.
What changes if it becomes law
- MAFAR ceases to exist as a single ministry and becomes three bodies.
- Agriculture and fisheries each acquire a ministry with its own minister, deputy minister and director general.
- Agrarian reform becomes an Office headed by a Regional Director rather than a Ministry.
- Each body gains its own provincial, city and municipal field structure.
- Book I, Title I of the Bangsamoro Administrative Code is amended to match.
- Each of the three gets a separate line in the annual appropriations act.
- A mandatory review falls due 10 years after implementation begins.
Raised during deliberations
No published record of the debate on this measure. Parliament’s journals cover sittings up to March 2023 only, and no committee report on it has been published.
What to notice
The asymmetry is the story. Two of the three come out of this as ministries, with a Minister, a Deputy Minister and a Director General; the third — agrarian reform — comes out as an Office headed by a Regional Director. A bill presented as separating three functions so each can be attended to properly in fact elevates two of them and leaves the third at a lower rank than the ministry it left. In a region where land tenure and ancestral domain are among the most contested questions there are, that is not a filing detail.
The title carries a naming wobble worth knowing about before anyone cites it. The title of the bill names the second body the Bangsamoro Ministry of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources; the operative section that performs the split calls it the "Bangsamoro-Ministry of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Office" — a ministry and an office in the same breath.
And the money is missing in the place it matters most. This is a reorganization bill: its entire cost is transitional — new offices, new posts, new field structures in every province and municipality, and compensation for displaced staff. The bill mentions the compensation and then says the funding goes in the appropriations act in three separate line items. What the separation costs to carry out is the one number a reader would want and the bill does not have it.
On its progress: filed in October 2022, First Reading in January 2023, and then nothing on the index until November 2025, when it reached Second Reading and was referred to the Committees on Amendments, Revision and Codification of Laws and on Finance. Nearly 3 years between readings is on the long side even for this Parliament.
Sources